The Velvet Café

A room for thoughts about movies

It got the science right – but what about the story?

with 11 comments

Growing up with a mother who has a job that partly is connected to the fight against epidemical diseases can be a bit of a pain. Ask my children.

It severely limits the variety of candies at your birthday parties. My poor kids were only allowed to have wrapped candies at theirs. Not those yummy sweet-and-sour bands with raspberry taste for instance.

Sure, I believe most children have been taught by their parents to wash their hands frequently, but how easily isn’t it to forget when you’re in the middle of a party?  One moment a girl licks some cream from the birthday cake off her fingers. The next she has buried the same hand deeply into the bowl of snacks, trying to find the best, whilst spreading a veritable zoo of assorted gems on every remaining piece. So we never served anything but wrapped candy – even if it meant that we were stuck with pretty boring pieces of toffee.

Once I brought my girls to a theatre to watch premier of a children’s play. There they had to watch how every other child in the audience treated themselves with a ton of candy from the public buckets, which was offered as a first-night special. I felt kind of bad for them, but the thought of the exchange of viruses that must have been going on in those bowls made me shiver, so I had no choice but to refuse them to touch it.

Getting cautious
After years of working in connecting fields, I’m afraid I’m a bit damaged. I still hesitate to eat raw bean sprouts in restaurants since I know they’ve been connected to outbreaks of food poisoning, something most people are mercifully unaware of.

But perhaps people will become a little bit more cautious after watching Steven Soderbergh’s Contagion which depictures a possible pandemic scenario. Every time someone coughed in the theatre I could sense the vibes of annoyance and fear in the air. How inconsiderate! Who knew what was flying around in the room, threatening the health of everyone?!

The question is how long it will last. Judging from how quickly the interest for using hand sanitizers evaporated after the most recent A (H1N1) outbreak, I have my doubts. It’s harder than you may think to make a long lasting impression and change people’s behaviour over time.

Listening to the experts
In any case I believe that the centres for disease control over the world ought to be pretty pleased with this movie. I’m not a doctor myself, so I can’t judge all the details, but for all I can tell they seem to have gotten the science part of it pretty much correctly. (Although I wonder if they’d really test a vaccine candidate on just one person, even if they were in a hurry.)

As far as I understand it, they’ve had a bunch of experts giving them advice, and it appears as if they mostly have listened to them. If I worked at one of those institutions I’d at least be quite pleased with the result. Contagion doesn’t only raise public awareness about infectious diseases; it also promotes the work that the authorities put into fighting them, and might make people more willing to give financial support to surveillance and research about it.

So the professionals did a good deal when they cooperated. They got something that is close to a propaganda movie in a flattering disguise.

The question is: is there a win-win situation here? Did the movie get better thanks to this – regarded as a movie? To be fair I’m not entirely convinced it did.

All over the place
There’s nothing wrong about basing a film on facts rather than imagination and speculation and the ambition to show many different aspects of what a pandemic means to society is good. I especially liked that they brought up the issue of rumours and false information spreading over the internet, which can just as a big threat as the virus in itself. Contagion could probably serve as – if not an educational film, at least an inspirational film for people interested in this field.

On the other hand – I believe that all those admirable ambitions also have contributed to a movie that feels a bit fractured. It’s all over the place, jumping from subplot to subplot, setting to setting, never exploring anything fully. There isn’t much room left to build well rounded, interesting characters with stories that I really care about. There’s an abundance of well known, skilled actors passing by – but how much are they given to do? Considering the seriousness of the topic, I feel way less than I think I should do.

All in all it’s a 4/5  in my book. I liked it overall, but I suspect it mostly reflects my personal fascination for huge outbreaks of dangerous diseases and the challenges you face fighting them.

Purely judged as a movie, it’s well crafted but quite forgettable.

Contagion (Steven Soderbergh, US, 2011) My rating: 4/5

Written by Jessica

November 1, 2011 at 1:00 am

Posted in Contagion

11 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. I gave it a slightly less score than this.

    I very much enjoyed (if that is the right word) the film. It showed how fragile our society is beautifully. I would have like to see more of the Winslet and Cottilard threads, but it is definitiely a good film!

    Great job as ever Jessica

    Scott Lawlor

    November 1, 2011 at 10:28 am

    • You’re always so supportive Scott! It means a lot to me.
      My rating reflects my interest for the topic. Otherwise it would have been a 3,5/5


      November 1, 2011 at 2:00 pm

  2. I haven’t seen Contagion yet, but from what I’ve read it’s a convincing (if somewhat generic) thriller in the vein of Outbreak and Pandemic. What has interested me to a certain degree is just how very few people have made the Outbreak comparison, and whether or not Contagion is a better film. What do you think?

    Rodney Twelftree

    November 2, 2011 at 8:54 am

    • To be honest I only had vague recollections of Outbreak, so I had to go and look it up at IMDb to even remember the plot. It gave me a reminder and from that one I’d say that Contagion is far better as a film about infectious diseases. Outbreak was more of an action movie though. The sort where there’s an evil general with a cunning plan to destroy the world that needs to be stopped. I’m not sure if the comparsion really is relevant. Sure, there are diseases. But the genres are different.


      November 2, 2011 at 9:08 am

  3. Contagion becomes a battle between what it is and what it could have been. It satisfies just enough to warrant its existence while frustrating one with its potential. Nice review.


    November 4, 2011 at 9:57 pm

    • Thank you! Yeah, I felt a bit frustrated too. It could have been better. But maybe I’m asking for something that is very hard to obtain. Something needed to be sacrificed.


      November 6, 2011 at 8:14 pm

  4. Interesting way to write about this movie! I’ve heard pretty good things about it but have not had a chance to see it yet, but will try to do so!


    November 8, 2011 at 9:17 pm

    • I think it’s a solid movie, definitely worth a watch.


      November 9, 2011 at 9:39 pm

  5. I thought the movie was was very good the first halv then it got kind of boring, too mucj science and the plot stopped being interesting when it was around 45 minutes left. I can´t be more specific than that whithout giving away spoilers.


    November 11, 2011 at 9:01 am

  6. […] Contagion – perhaps more scientifically correct than a cinematically perfect […]

  7. […] Jessica at The Velvet Cafe had this to say: “Purely judged as a movie, it’s well crafted but quite forgettable.” […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: